<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Use 125&#215;125 Ad Blocks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jeremyadamdavis.com/2008/02/09/why-use-125x125-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jeremyadamdavis.com/2008/02/09/why-use-125x125-ads/</link>
	<description>From Developer to Designer</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Naomi Dunford</title>
		<link>http://www.jeremyadamdavis.com/2008/02/09/why-use-125x125-ads/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Naomi Dunford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeremyadamdavis.com/2008/02/09/why-use-125x125-ads/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I think the use of a standardized ad format simply eliminates one more buying barrier. When one of my regular readers contacted me to advertise on his site, I was just about to say no and then thought, "What the hell. I've got a banner right here. I may as well."

Having 125x125 didn't make me come beating down his door, but if he'd asked me to do an ad redesign, it would've been enough to make me say no.

Cool site, btw. Like the top blogger analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the use of a standardized ad format simply eliminates one more buying barrier. When one of my regular readers contacted me to advertise on his site, I was just about to say no and then thought, &#8220;What the hell. I&#8217;ve got a banner right here. I may as well.&#8221;</p>
<p>Having 125&#215;125 didn&#8217;t make me come beating down his door, but if he&#8217;d asked me to do an ad redesign, it would&#8217;ve been enough to make me say no.</p>
<p>Cool site, btw. Like the top blogger analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.268 seconds -->
